Skip to main content
HR & Recruiting

Greenhouse vs Workable

Which hr & recruiting tool is right for you? Compare features, pricing, and user reviews to make the best choice.

G

Greenhouse

4.42,200 reviews

Mid-market to enterprise teams that want a structured, scalable hiring process with strong integrations, standardized interviewing, and robust reporting/controls.

Starting at Custom quote
W

Workable

4.0100 reviews

Small to mid-sized companies and growing teams that need an easy-to-use ATS to manage end-to-end recruiting (posting, sourcing, screening, interviewing, and reporting) with strong collaboration and integrations.

Starting at Starts around $149/month (varies by plan and hiring volume)

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureGreenhouseWorkable
PricingCustom quoteStarts around $149/month (varies by plan and hiring volume)
G2 Rating4.4 (2,200 reviews)4.0 (100 reviews)
Capterra Rating4.54.0
Best ForMid-market to enterprise teams that want a structured, scalable hiring process with strong integrations, standardized interviewing, and robust reporting/controls.Small to mid-sized companies and growing teams that need an easy-to-use ATS to manage end-to-end recruiting (posting, sourcing, screening, interviewing, and reporting) with strong collaboration and integrations.

Pros & Cons

Greenhouse

Pros

  • + Strong structured-hiring tooling (scorecards, interview kits, consistent evaluation)
  • + Large integrations ecosystem and solid API for connecting HR/recruiting stack
  • + Configurable workflows/permissions suitable for complex orgs
  • + Good reporting foundations for pipeline and hiring process visibility

Cons

  • Pricing is quote-based and can be expensive for smaller teams
  • Configuration and ongoing admin work can be significant without a dedicated owner
  • Some users report reporting/analytics and customization needs may require workarounds or add-ons

Workable

Pros

  • + User-friendly interface that’s quick to adopt for hiring managers and recruiters
  • + Strong job posting and pipeline management for structured, repeatable hiring
  • + Good collaboration features (scorecards, feedback, permissions) for team-based hiring
  • + Broad integration ecosystem (HRIS, calendars, email, background checks, assessments)

Cons

  • Total cost can increase with hiring volume, add-ons, or premium sourcing features
  • Some advanced customization/automation and reporting needs may require higher-tier plans
  • Not always the best fit for very large enterprises needing highly complex workflows and governance