Skip to main content
Project Management

Asana vs monday.com

Which project management tool is right for you? Compare features, pricing, and user reviews to make the best choice.

A

Asana

4.410,500 reviews

Cross-functional teams and project/program managers who need structured task tracking, timelines, and lightweight portfolio visibility across marketing, product, operations, and business teams.

Starting at $13.49/user/month
m

monday.com

4.712,500 reviews

Teams that want a flexible, visual work management platform for project tracking, cross-functional collaboration, and lightweight workflow automation—especially marketing, operations, product, and PMO-style teams that need customizable processes without heavy admin overhead.

Starting at From $9/user/month

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureAsanamonday.com
Pricing$13.49/user/monthFrom $9/user/month
G2 Rating4.4 (10,500 reviews)4.7 (12,500 reviews)
Capterra Rating4.54.6
Best ForCross-functional teams and project/program managers who need structured task tracking, timelines, and lightweight portfolio visibility across marketing, product, operations, and business teams.Teams that want a flexible, visual work management platform for project tracking, cross-functional collaboration, and lightweight workflow automation—especially marketing, operations, product, and PMO-style teams that need customizable processes without heavy admin overhead.

Pros & Cons

Asana

Pros

  • + Intuitive UI with flexible views for different work styles
  • + Strong collaboration features (comments, mentions, approvals) and task clarity
  • + Good automation and templates to standardize workflows
  • + Broad integration ecosystem and solid admin controls on higher tiers

Cons

  • Costs can rise quickly for larger teams or when advanced features are needed
  • Reporting/analytics and portfolio management can feel limited without higher tiers or add-ons
  • Can become complex to maintain at scale without consistent governance and conventions

monday.com

Pros

  • + Very flexible customization (boards, columns, views) to fit many workflows
  • + Strong collaboration UX (updates, mentions, notifications) and visibility
  • + Robust integrations and no-code automations to reduce manual work
  • + Good dashboards and reporting for portfolio-level oversight

Cons

  • Costs can rise quickly with more users, higher tiers, and seat minimums
  • Some advanced features (automations, integrations, reporting) require higher plans
  • Can feel complex to set up and govern at scale without clear standards