Skip to main content
Documentation & Knowledge

Confluence vs Document360

Which documentation & knowledge tool is right for you? Compare features, pricing, and user reviews to make the best choice.

C

Confluence

4.13,700 reviews

Teams that need a structured internal wiki/knowledge base and project documentation, especially organizations already using Atlassian tools like Jira and Jira Service Management.

Starting at ~$5.75/user/month
D

Document360

4.7450 reviews

Teams building customer-facing documentation or internal knowledge bases (SaaS, support, product, and engineering) that want a dedicated, structured documentation platform with strong search, governance, and analytics.

Starting at From ~$149/project/month

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureConfluenceDocument360
Pricing~$5.75/user/monthFrom ~$149/project/month
G2 Rating4.1 (3,700 reviews)4.7 (450 reviews)
Capterra Rating4.44.7
Best ForTeams that need a structured internal wiki/knowledge base and project documentation, especially organizations already using Atlassian tools like Jira and Jira Service Management.Teams building customer-facing documentation or internal knowledge bases (SaaS, support, product, and engineering) that want a dedicated, structured documentation platform with strong search, governance, and analytics.

Pros & Cons

Confluence

Pros

  • + Strong collaboration and documentation workflows with robust versioning
  • + Excellent integration with Jira and the broader Atlassian ecosystem/Marketplace
  • + Flexible organization via spaces, page trees, labels, and powerful search
  • + Granular permissions for spaces and pages suitable for larger teams

Cons

  • Can feel complex and cluttered at scale without governance and information architecture
  • Performance and navigation can degrade in very large instances with heavy content
  • Advanced admin/security features are typically gated behind higher-tier plans

Document360

Pros

  • + Clean authoring and publishing workflow with strong organization (categories, versions, permissions)
  • + Fast, relevant search and good reader experience for public docs
  • + Useful analytics to identify content gaps and improve self-serve support
  • + Integrates well with common support and collaboration tools

Cons

  • Pricing is project-based and can get expensive as you add projects, users, or advanced add-ons
  • Customization beyond built-in themes may require extra effort/technical work
  • Some advanced governance/SSO features are typically reserved for higher tiers