Why contract management software matters
Most small and mid-size companies manage contracts the same way: templates in a shared drive, redlines by email, signatures in a separate e-sign tool, and the signed PDF in whichever folder the person who closed the deal chose. It works until someone asks how many customer contracts auto-renew next quarter, or a vendor contract renews for another year because nobody saw the notice deadline.
Contract management software (often called CLM, for contract lifecycle management) puts the whole process in one system: drafting from approved templates, negotiation and redlining, internal approvals, e-signature, a searchable repository, and reminders for renewals and obligations. Newer tools add AI that reads contracts, pulls out key dates and terms, and in some cases redlines third-party paper against your rules.
This guide compares six tools for legal and operations teams at SMB and mid-market companies: Concord, Juro, Ironclad, PandaDoc, ContractWorks and Agiloft. They range from a simple repository (ContractWorks) to configurable enterprise platforms (Ironclad and Agiloft).
A plain warning about pricing. Most contract management vendors do not publish prices. Of the six tools here, only Concord and PandaDoc show prices on their websites. Juro, Ironclad and Agiloft sell by custom quote, and ContractWorks lists its plans but leaves the price blank. For those tools we describe what each plan includes from the vendor's own pages and do not guess at numbers.
We checked two things before including tools. Concord is still operating, with current plans and prices on its site and blog posts from September 2026. ContractWorks is still sold under the ContractWorks name, now as "an Onit product".
Everything below comes from each vendor's own pricing, product and help pages as of October 2026, in US dollars.
What to look for in contract management software
1. Drafting and templates. Can business users generate a standard contract (NDA, order form, offer letter) from a legal-approved template without editing the legal text? Look for conditional logic, a clause library and a Word-compatible editor if your counterparties send Word files.
2. Repository and search. Every tool here stores contracts. The differences are in how well it reads them: OCR for scanned PDFs, AI extraction of parties, dates and renewal terms, and full-text search.
3. AI review. AI that redlines incoming third-party contracts against your playbook saves legal the most time. Juro and Ironclad describe playbook-based AI review. Concord, PandaDoc and ContractWorks focus their AI on extraction, search and drafting help.
4. Approvals. Conditional approval rules (for example, finance must approve any discount over a threshold) keep business teams moving without email chains. Approvals often sit on higher plans: Concord Business, PandaDoc Business and ContractWorks Premium.
5. Renewal and deadline alerts. This is where contract software pays for itself fastest. Check that alerts can be set on notice dates, not just end dates, and that they reach the right owner.
6. E-signature. Concord, Juro, Ironclad, PandaDoc and ContractWorks include their own e-signature. Agiloft works with Docusign and Adobe Sign. If you already pay for an e-sign tool, check whether the CLM integrates with it or replaces it.
7. Integrations. Sales contracts should start from Salesforce or HubSpot, and HR contracts from your applicant tracking system. Integrations are a common extra charge: Juro charges extra for Salesforce, HubSpot and Workday, PandaDoc for Salesforce, and Concord includes CRM integrations from Business.
8. Users and pricing model. Seat-based pricing (Concord, PandaDoc) can get expensive as more people need access. Juro and ContractWorks include unlimited users. Free viewers and signers, as on Concord, keep costs down for occasional users.
Concord: full review
What it is. Concord is a contract management platform for drafting, negotiating, signing and tracking contracts in one browser-based tool. It is one of the few in this category that publishes its prices.
Key features.
- Drafting and negotiation. An editor that Concord compares to Word and Google Docs, with live editing, online redlining, version control, templates and drag-and-drop smart fields. A Microsoft Word plugin is listed among its integrations.
- E-signature. Unlimited legally binding e-signatures on every plan. Concord's FAQ says invitees can sign for free without creating an account. It lists compliance with the US ESIGN Act, eIDAS and GDPR.
- Repository and AI. A contract repository with OCR full-text search, contract data search and filters, autofill document summaries and bulk uploading. AI Copilot and extraction are included on every current plan.
- Renewals. Deadline and renewal reminders on every plan, plus amendment management, with a deadline calendar listed among the advanced features.
- Approvals and intake. Intake forms, approval workflow automations, custom roles and customized reports start on Business.
- Integrations. Business adds Salesforce, HubSpot, Google Drive, Box, Dropbox and Zapier, plus Slack in beta. Enterprise adds an open API.
Pricing.
- Essentials: $499 per month, paid annually, with 5 users included. Additional users are $49 per month.
- Business: $899 per month, paid annually, with 5 users included. Additional users are $69 per month.
- Enterprise: $1,299 per month, paid annually, with 5 users included. Additional users are $89 per month. Adds a clause library, subsidiary management, bulk send, open API and custom branding. Volume discounts are available.
Concord's FAQ says there are no setup or onboarding fees, no add-on costs beyond the plan and users, and that each subscription includes a designated customer success manager. The free trial lasts 14 days and needs no payment details.
Pros. Transparent pricing. Unlimited e-signatures and documents. Free viewers and guests. AI included.
Cons. Approvals and CRM integrations require Business. The clause library is Enterprise only. Only annual billing is listed.
Who it is for. Small and mid-size legal and operations teams that want the full contract lifecycle, including e-signature, without a long sales process.
Who should skip it. Very small teams that only need to store signed PDFs and track dates. ContractWorks or PandaDoc Starter may be enough.
Juro: full review
What it is. Juro is an AI contract platform built so legal teams can control templates while sales, HR, procurement and finance teams create and agree contracts themselves.
Key features.
- Self-serve templates. Business users create contracts from templates controlled by legal, or generate them from an integrated CRM or applicant tracking system.
- AI review. Juro's AI reviews third-party contracts against the playbooks you set and marks them up, showing which playbook rule led to each redline. It can review and redline in Microsoft Word. Juro notes that AI contract review is currently available in English only.
- Approvals. Conditional approvals based on values in your contracts, with an approval waterfall.
- E-signature. Native e-signature with sequential signatories, mobile signing and an audit trail. Juro says it meets the eIDAS advanced electronic signature standard.
- Repository and renewals. An AI repository you can query in plain language, key dates captured on upload, date smartfields and automated renewal reminders with custom timing.
- Integrations. Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Microsoft Word, Docusign, Zapier, Workday, Greenhouse, SharePoint, Google Drive and a REST API, plus connections to AI assistants.
Pricing. Juro does not publish prices. Its pricing page says every plan includes unlimited users, unlimited workflows and unlimited templates, and that price depends on your contract volume and integration needs. Out-of-the-box integrations such as Slack and Google Drive are included, while deeper integrations such as Salesforce, HubSpot and Workday cost extra. Juro suggests it suits businesses signing around 10 or more contracts a month.
Pros. Unlimited users. AI review driven by your own rules. Native e-signature. Designed for business teams, not only lawyers.
Cons. No public price. Key CRM and HR integrations cost extra. English-only AI review.
Who it is for. In-house legal teams at growing companies that want to stop drafting routine contracts by hand and let other teams self-serve safely.
Who should skip it. Companies with only a handful of contracts a month, or teams that need a published price before talking to sales.
Ironclad: full review
What it is. Ironclad is a contract lifecycle management platform for all contract types across legal, sales, procurement, HR and finance. It is the most widely known CLM in this list and is aimed at companies with high contract volume.
Key features.
- Workflow Designer. A no-code tool to build routing, approval and notification workflows, including a Workflow Designer Agent that lets admins describe routing in plain language.
- AI agents. Ironclad lists agents for contract review (redlining), intake, search, analytics, renewals and contract families, plus AI playbooks.
- Repository. A searchable repository with clause and metadata extraction and bulk import of legacy contracts.
- E-signature. Native Ironclad eSignature, click-based acceptance (clickwrap), or third-party tools. Ironclad lists integrations with Docusign, Adobe Acrobat Sign and Dropbox Sign.
- Integrations. Salesforce (AppExchange approved), HubSpot, Coupa, Microsoft Word, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Box, Google Drive, OneDrive and others, plus public APIs.
Pricing. Ironclad does not publish prices. You build a quote from products (CLM, AI assistant, eSignature), a deployment option (run it yourself, use Ironclad's legal engineers, or a partner) and extras such as API and integrations or additional instances. Ironclad says some integrations are included and some are add-ons.
Pros. Covers every contract type and department. Flexible no-code workflows. Choice of native or third-party e-signature.
Cons. No public pricing. Some integrations cost extra. More platform than many small teams will use.
Who it is for. Mid-market and larger companies with many contract types and high volume, where legal wants to stay out of routine deals.
Who should skip it. Small teams with simple contracts and a tight budget.
PandaDoc: full review
What it is. PandaDoc is best known for proposals and quotes, but it also includes contract features: a repository, AI search, approvals and expiration alerts. For sales-led companies whose contracts are mostly their own paper, it can cover contract management at a lower cost than a dedicated CLM.
Key features for contract management.
- Creation and signature. Drag-and-drop editor, templates (5 on Starter, unlimited on Business) and unlimited e-signatures on paid plans. PandaDoc lists compliance with the US ESIGN Act and eIDAS.
- Repository. Contract repository, folders, tags, search and AI search from Starter.
- AI. AI data extraction and an AI document digest on Business. AI renewal alerts are optional on Business and included on Enterprise.
- Alerts. Expiration alerts from Starter; auto expirations and auto reminders from Business.
- Approvals and collaboration. Approval workflows and suggested edits on Business; content locking optional on Business and included on Enterprise. Inline comments on every plan, and editing in Microsoft Word from Starter.
- Integrations. CRM integrations from Business; Salesforce is a paid add-on.
Pricing.
- Free: $0, 5 documents per month, up to 5 templates.
- Starter: $19 per seat per month billed annually, $35 billed monthly.
- Business: $49 per seat per month billed annually, $65 billed monthly.
- Enterprise: custom, per seat or per document. Adds custom roles and US or EU data residency, and includes SSO and team workspaces (both optional on Business).
Documents created through the API, integrations, web forms or bulk send use usage credits. Prices exclude taxes. The free trial lasts 14 days with no credit card.
Pros. Published prices and a free plan. Repository and expiration alerts at a low per-seat price. One tool for quotes, proposals and contracts.
Cons. Approvals need Business. Renewal AI is an extra on Business. Built more for sending your own documents than negotiating the other side's.
Who it is for. Sales-led SMBs that want contracts created, signed and stored in the same tool as their quotes.
Who should skip it. Legal teams that spend most of their time redlining third-party contracts. Juro, Ironclad or Concord fit better.
ContractWorks: full review
What it is. ContractWorks, now an Onit product, is a contract repository first. It focuses on storing, tagging, searching and tracking signed contracts, with drafting and workflows on its top plan.
Key features.
- Repository. Drag-and-drop uploads, AI-powered document tagging that identifies agreement type, parties, dates, renewal terms and notice windows, OCR and advanced search.
- Alerts and reporting. Date alerts and customizable, scheduled reports on every plan.
- E-signature. Built-in e-signature, with 5, 10 or 20 signature licenses depending on plan.
- Access and security. Unlimited users, permission-based roles, audit log and SAML 2.0 single sign-on on every plan. ContractWorks says its repository is SOC 2 Type 2 compliant.
- Premium CLM features. Drafting templates with conditional logic, bulk document creation, a Word-compatible editor, redlining, a clause library, conditional approval flows, an AI clause creator, version control and a Salesforce integration.
Pricing. ContractWorks lists three plans, all billed annually, but its pricing page does not show the price:
- Standard: unlimited users, 2,500 documents, 5 e-signature licenses.
- Professional: unlimited users, 10,000 documents, 10 e-signature licenses.
- Premium: unlimited users, unlimited documents, 20 e-signature licenses, plus drafting, redlining and workflows.
There is a 14-day free trial, and nonprofit discounts are available on request.
Pros. Simple to set up. Unlimited users and SSO on every plan. Strong for finding contracts and tracking dates.
Cons. No visible prices. Drafting, redlining, approvals and Salesforce only on Premium. Document caps on the two lower plans.
Who it is for. Legal, finance and operations teams that mainly need a secure, searchable home for signed contracts and reliable renewal alerts.
Who should skip it. Teams that need heavy drafting and negotiation features but cannot justify Premium.
Agiloft: full review
What it is. Agiloft is a configurable contract lifecycle management platform for legal and procurement teams. Its pitch is flexibility: approved team members can configure contracts, approval chains and processes without writing code.
Key features.
- No-code configuration of contract types, approval chains and processes.
- Pre- and post-signature coverage. Creation and negotiation through obligation tracking and renewal management.
- Astra AI. Agiloft's AI platform for search, extraction of terms, risks and obligations, and contract review.
- E-signature. Ready with Docusign and Adobe Sign out of the box. Agiloft does not list its own e-signature.
- Integrations. Agiloft says it works with Salesforce, SAP, Oracle and more than 1,000 other systems.
Pricing. Agiloft does not publish prices. Its pricing page asks you to contact sales for a quote. Implementation services and support plans are listed separately as services.
Pros. Very flexible. Strong focus on obligations and renewals after signature. ERP integrations suit procurement-heavy companies.
Cons. No public pricing. Requires a separate e-signature subscription. Flexibility means more setup work.
Who it is for. Mid-market and enterprise teams with complex or unusual contract processes, especially procurement teams tied to an ERP.
Who should skip it. SMBs that want to be running in days with standard workflows.
What it costs: a 5-person and a 10-person legal and ops team
Only Concord and PandaDoc publish prices, so only they appear in the arithmetic. All figures use annual billing and exclude taxes and add-ons.
Five users:
| Tool and plan | Calculation | Yearly cost |
|---|---|---|
| PandaDoc Starter (repository, alerts, no approvals) | 5 x $19 x 12 | $1,140 |
| PandaDoc Business (approvals) | 5 x $49 x 12 | $2,940 |
| Concord Essentials (5 users included) | $499 x 12 | $5,988 |
| Concord Business (approvals, CRM) | $899 x 12 | $10,788 |
Ten users:
| Tool and plan | Calculation | Yearly cost |
|---|---|---|
| PandaDoc Starter | 10 x $19 x 12 | $2,280 |
| PandaDoc Business | 10 x $49 x 12 | $5,880 |
| Concord Essentials | ($499 x 12) + (5 x $49 x 12) | $8,928 |
| Concord Business | ($899 x 12) + (5 x $69 x 12) | $14,928 |
| Concord Enterprise | ($1,299 x 12) + (5 x $89 x 12) | $20,928 |
Two notes on reading these numbers. First, PandaDoc and Concord are not equal products: Concord includes unlimited e-signatures, free viewers and AI on every plan, while PandaDoc's AI renewal alerts are an option on Business and its Salesforce integration is an add-on. Second, if many people only need to look at or sign contracts, Concord's free viewers and guests and the unlimited users on Juro and ContractWorks can change the math. Ask the quote-only vendors for a price based on your real contract volume and user count before comparing.
Rolling out contract management software
Buying the tool is the easy part. Most of the value depends on getting your existing contracts in and getting people to use it. A simple rollout plan for a small legal or ops team:
1. Collect your contracts first. Pull signed contracts from shared drives, email and your e-sign tool into one folder before you start. Note which ones are still active. Old, expired agreements can go in later.
2. Agree on the data you want to track. Pick a short list of fields for every contract: counterparty, contract type, owner, start date, end date, renewal type (auto or manual), notice period and value. Too many fields slow everyone down; too few and reports are useless. AI extraction in Concord, Juro, ContractWorks, PandaDoc Business and Ironclad can fill many of these, but check the results on a sample.
3. Set up renewal alerts on day one. Alerts on notice dates are the quickest win. Assign each contract an owner so reminders go to someone who can act.
4. Convert your most common templates. Start with the two or three contracts you send most often, such as an NDA, an order form or a contractor agreement. Lock the legal text and leave only the business fields editable.
5. Add approvals only where they matter. Approval rules on every contract slow things down. Start with a few triggers, such as non-standard payment terms, discounts above a threshold, or contract value above a limit.
6. Connect the systems people already use. If sales lives in Salesforce or HubSpot, launch contracts from there. If HR uses an applicant tracking system, generate offer letters from it. Price these integrations before you sign, since several vendors charge extra.
7. Review after 90 days. Check how many contracts went through the tool, how long approvals took, and whether any renewals were missed. Adjust templates and rules based on what you see.
How to choose
Start with your biggest pain. If you lose track of signed contracts and renewal dates, start with a repository-first tool such as ContractWorks, or Concord Essentials. If legal is buried in redlines, look at tools with playbook-based AI review: Juro or Ironclad. If sales is waiting on contracts, look at self-serve templates and CRM integrations: Juro, Ironclad, Concord Business or PandaDoc Business.
Decide whose paper you sign. Companies that mostly send their own contracts can do well with PandaDoc or Concord. Companies that receive a lot of vendor or customer paper benefit more from AI review in Juro or Ironclad.
Count users realistically. Seat-based tools get expensive when sales, HR and finance all need access. Unlimited-user pricing (Juro, ContractWorks) or free viewers (Concord) can be cheaper at the same headcount.
Check e-signature overlap. If you already pay for an e-sign tool, you may be able to drop it with Concord, Juro, Ironclad, PandaDoc or ContractWorks. Agiloft relies on Docusign or Adobe Sign.
Ask quote-only vendors the same questions. For Juro, Ironclad, Agiloft and ContractWorks, ask for: the annual price for your contract volume and users, which integrations cost extra, implementation fees, minimum term, and what happens to price at renewal.
Test with real contracts. Upload 20 of your existing contracts during a trial (Concord, PandaDoc and ContractWorks each offer 14 days) and check whether the AI picks up renewal dates and notice periods correctly.
Conclusion
Concord is the best contract management software for most SMB and mid-market legal and operations teams in 2026. It publishes its prices, includes unlimited e-signatures, AI extraction and renewal reminders on every plan, and covers drafting and negotiation. Budget for Business if you need approval workflows or CRM integrations.
Choose Juro if your legal team wants business users to self-serve on contracts with AI review against your own playbook. Choose Ironclad if you have high volume across many departments. PandaDoc is the low-cost option for sales-led teams that mostly send their own paper. ContractWorks is the simplest way to get a searchable repository and renewal alerts. Agiloft suits teams with complex processes that need deep configuration. For the four quote-only tools, get written quotes based on your real volumes before you decide.

