Skip to main content
SoftwareCompare
From $16Free planG2 4.8 · 142 reviews

Teams that want an open-source, self-hostable Make alternative with flat, predictable pricing for multi-step workflows.

Visit Activepieces ↗See full comparison

Quick overview

Pricing
Free (1,000 credits); paid from $16/month (Plus, annual)
Plans
Free: 1,000 credits, up to 5 users. Plus: $20/month flat ($16/month billed annually), 10,000 credits/month, up to 5 users. Team: $200/month ($166/month annually), 50,000 credits/month, 25 users, SSO, unlimited projects. Ultimate: custom, yearly credit pool, SCIM, custom roles, audit logs, Git sync. Overage on Plus and Team: $0.007 per credit. 1 credit per run regardless of steps; AI steps cost 2, 10 or 20 credits (1 with your own keys on Plus and up). Embed from $36,000/year. Community Edition free to self-host (MIT core).
G2 rating
4.8 / 5.0
Comparisons
Featured in 3 comparisons

Key features

  • 1 credit per run, regardless of the number of steps
  • MIT-licensed core, self-hostable with Docker or Kubernetes
  • 760+ integrations (pieces)
  • AI Agents, Chat, Tables and an MCP server
  • Build it with AI: describe a step and it's written for you
  • Unlimited flows on every plan

Pros

  • Truly open-source MIT core you can self-host
  • Per-run billing keeps long workflows cheap
  • Flat $20 or $200 monthly plans are easy to budget
  • AI agents and MCP built in

Cons

  • Fewer integrations than Make (760+ versus 3,500+)
  • AI steps cost 2 to 20 credits unless you bring your own keys
  • SSO needs the $200 Team plan; SCIM and audit logs need Ultimate

Activepieces in our comparisons

Automation & Integration

Make alternatives

Pick n8n if you have a technical builder and long workflows, since it bills per run instead of per step. Pick Zapier if your builders aren't technical, or Activepieces if you want an open-source core with flat pricing.

+2
Sarah ChenUpdated October 2026
Automation & Integration

n8n alternatives

Stay with n8n if you have technical builders and its license fits internal use. Pick Activepieces if you need a true open-source license, or Zapier if your builders are not technical.

+2
Sarah ChenUpdated October 2026
Automation & Integration

Zapier alternatives

Stay with Zapier if you want the most app connections and the easiest builder. Switch to Make for better value on complex workflows, or n8n if you have technical skills and want per-run pricing or self-hosting.

+2
Sarah ChenUpdated October 2026