Skip to main content
Automation & Integration

Make vs Activepieces

Which automation & integration tool is right for you? Compare features, pricing, and user reviews to make the best choice.

Make

From $12Free plan

Teams that want a powerful visual automation builder at a low entry price, with workflows that are short enough that per-module credits stay cheap.

Activepieces

From $16Free plan
G2 4.8 · 142 reviews

Teams that want an open-source, self-hostable Make alternative with flat, predictable pricing for multi-step workflows.

Side by side

MakeActivepieces
PricingFree (1,000 credits/month); paid from $12/month (Core, annual)Free (1,000 credits); paid from $16/month (Plus, annual)
G2 RatingNot yet verified4.8 (142 reviews)
Best ForTeams that want a powerful visual automation builder at a low entry price, with workflows that are short enough that per-module credits stay cheap.Teams that want an open-source, self-hostable Make alternative with flat, predictable pricing for multi-step workflows.

Pros and cons

Make

Pros

  • Very low cost per unit at the entry level (10,000 credits for $12/month, annual)
  • Flexible visual canvas with branching and error handling
  • Unlimited users on every plan
  • Large app library (3,500+)

Cons

  • Every module run uses a credit, so long workflows get expensive
  • Make's own AI tools bill by tokens or run time, which is harder to forecast
  • Cloud only; no self-hosted edition
  • SSO and audit logs are Enterprise only

Activepieces

Pros

  • Truly open-source MIT core you can self-host
  • Per-run billing keeps long workflows cheap
  • Flat $20 or $200 monthly plans are easy to budget
  • AI agents and MCP built in

Cons

  • Fewer integrations than Make (760+ versus 3,500+)
  • AI steps cost 2 to 20 credits unless you bring your own keys
  • SSO needs the $200 Team plan; SCIM and audit logs need Ultimate

Related comparisons

Explore other categories