Make vs n8n
Which automation & integration tool is right for you? Compare features, pricing, and user reviews to make the best choice.
Make
Teams that want a powerful visual automation builder at a low entry price, with workflows that are short enough that per-module credits stay cheap.
n8n
Technical teams with long, multi-step workflows or strict data rules who want per-run pricing and the option to self-host.
Side by side
| Make | n8n | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (1,000 credits/month); paid from $12/month (Core, annual) | Free self-hosted Community Edition; cloud from $20/month (Starter, annual) |
| G2 Rating | Not yet verified | 4.7 (319 reviews) |
| Best For | Teams that want a powerful visual automation builder at a low entry price, with workflows that are short enough that per-module credits stay cheap. | Technical teams with long, multi-step workflows or strict data rules who want per-run pricing and the option to self-host. |
Pros and cons
Make
Pros
- Very low cost per unit at the entry level (10,000 credits for $12/month, annual)
- Flexible visual canvas with branching and error handling
- Unlimited users on every plan
- Large app library (3,500+)
Cons
- Every module run uses a credit, so long workflows get expensive
- Make's own AI tools bill by tokens or run time, which is harder to forecast
- Cloud only; no self-hosted edition
- SSO and audit logs are Enterprise only
n8n
Pros
- Long workflows cost the same as short ones (per-execution billing)
- Free self-hosted edition for internal use
- Strong AI agent and MCP support
- Unlimited users and workflows on every plan
Cons
- Sustainable Use License is not OSI open source and limits commercial redistribution
- Cloud Starter allows only 2,500 executions and 5 concurrent runs
- Business ($800/month, annual) is self-hosted only
- Steeper learning curve for non-technical users
Related comparisons
Make alternatives
Pick n8n if you have a technical builder and long workflows, since it bills per run instead of per step. Pick Zapier if your builders aren't technical, or Activepieces if you want an open-source core with flat pricing.
Sarah ChenUpdated October 2026n8n alternatives
Stay with n8n if you have technical builders and its license fits internal use. Pick Activepieces if you need a true open-source license, or Zapier if your builders are not technical.
Sarah ChenUpdated October 2026Zapier alternatives
Stay with Zapier if you want the most app connections and the easiest builder. Switch to Make for better value on complex workflows, or n8n if you have technical skills and want per-run pricing or self-hosting.
Sarah ChenUpdated October 2026