Activepieces vs Windmill
Which automation & integration tool is right for you? Compare features, pricing, and user reviews to make the best choice.
Activepieces
From $16Free plan
G2 4.8 · 142 reviewsTeams that want an open-source, self-hostable Make alternative with flat, predictable pricing for multi-step workflows.
vs
Windmill
From $120Free plan
Developer teams that want to turn scripts into workflows, scheduled jobs and internal tools, and pay for compute instead of executions.
Side by side
| Activepieces | Windmill | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (1,000 credits); paid from $16/month (Plus, annual) | Free Community Edition; Enterprise from $120/month |
| G2 Rating | 4.8 (142 reviews) | Not yet verified |
| Best For | Teams that want an open-source, self-hostable Make alternative with flat, predictable pricing for multi-step workflows. | Developer teams that want to turn scripts into workflows, scheduled jobs and internal tools, and pay for compute instead of executions. |
Pros and cons
Activepieces
Pros
- Truly open-source MIT core you can self-host
- Per-run billing keeps long workflows cheap
- Flat $20 or $200 monthly plans are easy to budget
- AI agents and MCP built in
Cons
- Fewer integrations than Make (760+ versus 3,500+)
- AI steps cost 2 to 20 credits unless you bring your own keys
- SSO needs the $200 Team plan; SCIM and audit logs need Ultimate
Windmill
Pros
- Code-first with many supported languages
- No execution metering
- AGPLv3 open-source core you can self-host
- Covers workflows, jobs and internal apps in one place
Cons
- Far fewer prebuilt app connectors than n8n
- Not built for non-technical users
- Community Edition images include proprietary features, and AGPL has obligations if you modify and serve it
- Free edition limited to 3 workspaces and 10 SSO users
Sarah Chen