Eqvista
Entry plan
$2.00 × 10 seats$20.00
× 12 months$240.00
Per year
$2.00 per person / mo
$240
Eqvista vs Astrella
Compare with for .
Eqvista
71%
match · $240/yr
Astrella
38%
match · $1,200/yr
What matters most?
Fine-tune
What you'd pay
Entry plan for 10 people, billed yearly where offered. Prices checked Oct 2026.
Smaller bill
Astrella
Entry plan
Flat price, whole team$100.00
× 12 months$1,200.00
Per year
$10.00 per person / mo
$1,200
Eqvista
From $2Free plan
Cost-conscious US startups whose main recurring equity cost is the 409A valuation and who want a cap table bundled in.
vs
Astrella
From $1,200
G2 4.5 · 51 reviewsUS companies that want ASC 718 reporting and full onboarding at a single published price per stakeholder band.
Side by side
| Eqvista | Astrella | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (<20 stakeholders); $2/stakeholder/month | $1,200 to $8,200/year by stakeholder band |
| G2 Rating | Not yet verified | 4.5 (51 reviews) |
| Best For | Cost-conscious US startups whose main recurring equity cost is the 409A valuation and who want a cap table bundled in. | US companies that want ASC 718 reporting and full onboarding at a single published price per stakeholder band. |
Pros and cons
Eqvista
Pros
- Free plan for companies under 20 stakeholders
- Unlimited 409A updates in bundles from $990 a year
- Per-stakeholder pricing that is easy to forecast
- SEC-registered transfer agent with a broad menu of valuation services
Cons
- ASC 718 reporting is a separate service from $500
- No UK EMI or European scheme support advertised
- Custom pricing above 50 stakeholders on Premium
Astrella
Pros
- Simple stakeholder-band pricing published on the website
- ASC 718/IFRS and exit modeling in every package
- Full-service onboarding and unlimited phone support included
- Backed by EQ, a large transfer agent and shareholder services group
Cons
- 409A valuations are a quoted add-on
- Sharp price jumps at each stakeholder band
- Few published details on international schemes such as EMI
Emily Rodriguez