Skip to main content
Accounting & Finance

Eqvista vs Vestd

Compare with for 10 people.

Eqvista
60%
match · $240/yr
Vestd
43%
match · quote

Eqvista is the better fit.

It publishes its prices; the other needs a sales quote.

How we work out the match
What matters most?
Fine-tune

What you'd pay

Entry plan for 10 people, billed yearly where offered. Prices checked Oct 2026.

Eqvista
Premium
$2.00 × 10 seats$20.00
× 12 months$240.00
Per year
$2.00 per person / mo
$240

Vestd
Sales quote
No public priceask sales
Per year
Quote

No public price

Choose a tool

Eqvista

From $2Free plan

Budget-conscious US startups that mainly need a compliant 409A valuation and a clean cap table.

Vestd

From £25
G2 4.7 · 63 reviews

UK companies setting up or running an EMI or growth share scheme that want guided, human support.

Side by side

EqvistaVestd
PricingFree under 20 stakeholders; Premium $2/stakeholder/monthFrom £25/month (Essentials); Starter from £220/month
G2 RatingNot yet verified4.7 (63 reviews)
Best ForBudget-conscious US startups that mainly need a compliant 409A valuation and a clean cap table.UK companies setting up or running an EMI or growth share scheme that want guided, human support.

Pros and cons

Eqvista

Pros

  • Low entry price for cap table and 409A
  • Waterfall modeling without a top-tier plan
  • ASC 718 available as a service from $500
  • Unlimited 409A updates within the bundle

Cons

  • US-focused, with no UK EMI features on its pricing page
  • Lighter HRIS automation and investor tools than Carta or Ledgy
  • Custom pricing above 50 stakeholders

Vestd

Pros

  • Built for UK share schemes and HMRC workflows
  • Unlimited HMRC valuations on Guided
  • Specialist support for scheme design
  • Low-cost Essentials plan before you need a scheme

Cons

  • No free plan and a 12-month minimum term
  • EMI requires the Guided plan (from £420/month)
  • Poor fit for US C-corps

Related comparisons

Explore other categories