Skip to main content
Accounting & Finance

Carta vs Astrella

Compare with for 10 people.

Carta
45%
match · quote
Astrella
54%
match · $1,200/yr

Astrella is the better fit.

It publishes its prices; the other needs a sales quote.

How we work out the match
What matters most?
Fine-tune

What you'd pay

Entry plan for 10 people, billed yearly where offered. Prices checked Oct 2026.

Carta
Sales quote
No public priceask sales
Per year
Quote

No public price

Astrella
Entry plan
Flat price, whole team$100.00
× 12 months$1,200.00
Per year
$10.00 per person / mo
$1,200

Choose a tool

Carta

From FreeFree plan

US venture-backed startups that want the cap table, 409As, ASC 718 reporting, tender offers and IPO preparation from one vendor and accept quote-based pricing.

Astrella

From $1,200
G2 4.5 · 51 reviews

US companies that want ASC 718 reporting and full onboarding at a single published price per stakeholder band.

Side by side

CartaAstrella
PricingFree (Launch); paid plans quote-based$1,200 to $8,200/year by stakeholder band
G2 RatingNot yet verified4.5 (51 reviews)
Best ForUS venture-backed startups that want the cap table, 409As, ASC 718 reporting, tender offers and IPO preparation from one vendor and accept quote-based pricing.US companies that want ASC 718 reporting and full onboarding at a single published price per stakeholder band.

Pros and cons

Carta

Pros

  • Widest feature set in one product, from incorporation to IPO advisory
  • SEC-registered transfer agent with online exercises and repurchases
  • 409A valuations and ASC 718 audit support handled in-house on higher plans
  • Interface already familiar to many investors, lawyers and employees

Cons

  • No public prices for Build, Grow or Scale
  • Free Launch plan ends at 25 stakeholders or $1M raised
  • 409As require Grow and ASC 718 reporting requires Scale

Astrella

Pros

  • Simple stakeholder-band pricing published on the website
  • ASC 718/IFRS and exit modeling in every package
  • Full-service onboarding and unlimited phone support included
  • Backed by EQ, a large transfer agent and shareholder services group

Cons

  • 409A valuations are a quoted add-on
  • Sharp price jumps at each stakeholder band
  • Few published details on international schemes such as EMI

Related comparisons

Explore other categories