Skip to main content
HR & Recruiting

LinkedIn vs ZipRecruiter

Compare with for 10 people.

LinkedIn
60%
match · $0/yr
ZipRecruiter
63%
match · quote

ZipRecruiter is the better fit.

Users rate it 4.8 out of 5 on G2.

How we work out the match
What matters most?
Fine-tune

What you'd pay

Entry plan for 10 people, billed yearly where offered. Prices checked Oct 2026.

LinkedIn
Free
Free to use$0.00
Per year
$0

Free to start

ZipRecruiter
Sales quote
No public priceask sales
Per year
Quote

No public price

Choose a tool

LinkedIn

From FreeFree plan

Businesses hiring for professional, office, sales, management and specialist roles, including candidates who are not actively job hunting.

ZipRecruiter

From FreeFree plan
G2 4.8 · 1,429 reviews

Businesses hiring several roles at once that want wide distribution and a fixed monthly plan instead of per-click budgets.

Side by side

LinkedInZipRecruiter
Pricing1 free post at a time; promoted posts pay-per-clickNot published; free trial for new employers
G2 RatingNot yet verified4.8 (1,429 reviews)
Best ForBusinesses hiring for professional, office, sales, management and specialist roles, including candidates who are not actively job hunting.Businesses hiring several roles at once that want wide distribution and a fixed monthly plan instead of per-click budgets.

Pros and cons

LinkedIn

Pros

  • Strongest reach for professional roles
  • Rich candidate profiles
  • Capped, flexible promoted budgets
  • Hiring Pro screening help for teams without recruiters

Cons

  • Free posts limited to one at a time and roughly 10 to 30 applications
  • No published cost per click
  • Weaker for hourly and frontline roles

ZipRecruiter

Pros

  • Wide distribution from a single post
  • No per-click or per-application charges
  • Job slots reusable once a role is filled
  • Round-the-clock support

Cons

  • Prices not published
  • Distribution can bring volume over fit
  • Resume Database not in the entry plan

Related comparisons

Explore other categories