Skip to main content
Team Communication

Slack vs Microsoft Teams

Which team communication tool is right for you? Compare features, pricing, and user reviews to make the best choice.

Slack

From $7.25Free plan
G2 4.5 · 39,319 reviews

Teams that need fast, searchable, channel-based communication with strong integrations and automation—especially cross-functional groups working across many projects and tools.

Microsoft Teams

From $4Free plan
G2 4.4 · 19,339 reviews

Organizations already using Microsoft 365 that want an all-in-one hub for chat, meetings, and file collaboration with strong admin, security, and compliance controls.

Side by side

SlackMicrosoft Teams
PricingFree; paid from $7.25/user/month (annual)Free; paid from $4/user/month (annual)
G2 Rating4.5 (39,319 reviews)4.4 (19,339 reviews)
Best ForTeams that need fast, searchable, channel-based communication with strong integrations and automation—especially cross-functional groups working across many projects and tools.Organizations already using Microsoft 365 that want an all-in-one hub for chat, meetings, and file collaboration with strong admin, security, and compliance controls.

Pros and cons

Slack

Pros

  • Excellent channel-based organization and message search
  • Large integration ecosystem and strong API platform
  • Easy to adopt with a polished UX across desktop and mobile
  • Automation options (Workflow Builder) reduce repetitive coordination work

Cons

  • Costs can add up at scale, especially for larger organizations
  • Notification overload and channel sprawl without good governance
  • Some advanced security/compliance features require higher-tier plans

Microsoft Teams

Pros

  • Tight integration with Microsoft 365 (Outlook, SharePoint/OneDrive, Office apps) for streamlined collaboration
  • Robust meeting capabilities for internal and external collaboration (screen share, recording, captions—plan-dependent)
  • Strong enterprise-grade security, identity, and compliance options (plan-dependent)
  • Large ecosystem of integrations and extensibility via Teams apps and automation

Cons

  • Can feel complex or heavy for small teams; feature set varies by license and can be confusing
  • Performance and reliability can vary depending on device, network, and tenant configuration
  • Notification and channel sprawl can become hard to manage without governance and good practices

Related comparisons

Explore other categories