UserTesting
Sales quote
No public priceask sales
Per year
Quote
No public price
Visit UserTesting ↗UserTesting vs Lyssna
Compare with for .
UserTesting
41%
match · quote
Lyssna
69%
match · $1,992/yr
Lyssna is the better fit.
It publishes its prices; the other needs a sales quote.
How we work out the matchWhat matters most?
Fine-tune
What you'd pay
Entry plan for 10 people, billed yearly where offered. Prices checked Oct 2026.
Lyssna
Growth
Flat price, whole team$166.00
× 12 months$1,992.00
Per year
$16.60 per person / mo
$1,992
UserTesting
From Custom
G2 4.4 · 791 reviewsEnterprises that want a large on-demand panel, fast video feedback and benchmarking across many teams, and can budget for an annual contract.
vs
Lyssna
From $166Free plan
G2 4.5 · 189 reviewsSmall and mid-size product teams that want published prices, a free plan and quick unmoderated tests, IA tests and interviews in one tool.
Side by side
| UserTesting | Lyssna | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom pricing (annual subscription, by quote) | Free; Growth $166/month (billed annually) or $199/month (billed monthly) |
| G2 Rating | 4.4 (791 reviews) | 4.5 (189 reviews) |
| Best For | Enterprises that want a large on-demand panel, fast video feedback and benchmarking across many teams, and can budget for an annual contract. | Small and mid-size product teams that want published prices, a free plan and quick unmoderated tests, IA tests and interviews in one tool. |
Pros and cons
UserTesting
Pros
- Large participant network and fast turnaround on unmoderated video tests
- Broad method coverage, including QXscore benchmarks
- No per-seat charges on its plan types
- Enterprise security certifications listed on the plans page
Cons
- No published prices; every plan is by quote
- Card sorting, tree testing and AI test creation need Ultimate
- Annual commitment
- More than a small team or startup usually needs
Lyssna
Pros
- Free plan and a self-serve paid plan with prices on the site
- Panel cost is predictable: 1 credit ($1) per minute of test length
- Wide set of quick methods, including IA tests
- Credits do not expire
Cons
- Growth caps in-depth studies at 5 a month
- SSO and SOC 2 report only on Enterprise
- Panel (690,000+ panelists) is smaller than the multi-million panel Maze advertises
- Not built as a long-term repository for interview analysis
Emily Rodriguez